mathjax for tex support (General)
Hello
That's the question. With only a URL we can't decide, to take the old or the new way.
Is it useful to support the old way (until the end[tm])?
Don't know (and no!). If we change the method of the TeX-rendering, it seems to be fair to make an old behaviour deprecated in a first step and not removing it instantly. On the other hand I wouldn't expect many forums using the TeX-formula-feature at all so it would affect only a few installations. Assuming, we inform our audience early and open enough, every one of the few affected forum operators can prepare her/himself.
What will we do in the future, if we found another service/way to enable TeX-support? Isn't it a barrel without ground?
This is not impossible but I would assume that future libs behave similar (not equal) to MathJax (clientside rendering and thatswhy JavaScript).
Currently, I prefer the following solution:
bbcode_tex
can be enabled/disables (i.e. set to 1 or 0); per default, the option is disabled
Yes.
bbcode_tex_uri
is a new option to define the URI of mathjax (default value is the external service)
That would remove the old behaviour.
Depending on the tex option
bbcode_tex
, we add the script defined inbbcode_tex_uri
(at runtime). If the option is disabled, we don't add any further script.
So the proposal is to remove the old way to render TeX-formulas?
Tschö, Auge
--
Trenne niemals Müll, denn er hat nur eine Silbe!